floydslist.com
Home About Us Privacy Terms & Conditions Add Your Link Add Your Article
Search:   
Get Free Links
 
   

Automotive

   

Food & Recipe

   

Recreation

   

Self Enhancement

   

Travel & Accommodation

   

Health & Therapy

   

Children

   

Banking & Finance

   

News & Events

   

Games & Play

   

Business & Commerce

   

Policies & Law

   

Academics & Learning

   

Society & Communities

   

Art & Culture

   

Research & Science

   

Home Family & Garden

   

Medicine & Treatment

   

Jobs & Employment

   

Sports & Adventure

   

Online Shopping

   

Relationship & Lifestyle

   

Property & Estate

   

Internet & Computers

 

  Home –› Policies & Law –› Intellectual Property & Piracy
   
 

Patent - Marketing Strategy

   

In this article we're going to discuss the tricky aspect of marketing strategy when applying for a patent.

Getting a patent is a tricky process under normal circumstances. Under laws of the United States a company or person is entitled to a patent unless the invention was on sale in the country for more than one year prior to the application date of the patent. This applies to both sales and offers of sales. Therefore, companies conducting marketing campaigns must be careful not to destroy their patent rights. In a perfect world, application for a patent should be filed before any sales begin. But then that would hurt the company's bottom line because that ultimately puts profits on hold. In a competitive marketplace this could spell disaster for the company.

Therefore, it is important for a company to understand just what it is that starts the one year clock ticking. In other words what can they do and what can't they do in order to avoid their product being put on the timer?

In order to answer that question we have to understand what exactly, according to law, starts the clock running. There are basically two conditions. The first one is that the invention must be ready for patenting at the time of the sale. If it can be shown that the inventor had sufficient drawings that would enable another person to use the invention then this would satisfy the first criteria.

The second criteria is that there has actually been an offer for sale. In other words, the inventor or company that owns the invention approaches another company and offers to sell them the invention. This can either be in the form of a letter to the other company or in an actual physical meeting between the two companies. Usually the meeting follows a letter.

In the form of a letter the owner of the invention will usually draw up a letter stating that they have such and such an invention and go on to say that they feel this is something that would enhance their business. In the letter they would describe what the invention does and how it would help them. They would then ask the other company to get back to them if interested.

When it comes to the meeting the inventor will bring drawings of his invention and present them to the company interested in acquiring the invention. Maybe the inventor even has a working prototype he can show them. This is always a plus. Companies actually like to see that the invention they are interested in works.

Where the law comes in, and this is where inventors can delay the clock, is that the following items do not fall within the two criteria. Solicitation of customer pricing information from distributors and sales representatives; publication of preliminary data sheets and promotional information on invention features; communications to sales representatives; sales representatives providing customers with preliminary data sheets; and sales representatives' requests for customer samples.

Therefore, an inventor can engage in any of the above activities and NOT start the one year clock running. This allows the inventor to get as much preliminary leg work done for his patent without actually "technically" starting the process.

This is important information for any inventor to have if he is trying to gain as much ground in his quest for a patent as possible.

Author: Michael Russell
 
Author Bio:

Michael Russell

Michael Russell has been involved in online business since early 2001, and whilst spending countless hours each month running his business still finds time for various hobbies and interests.

 
 
 

Related Articles

 
Business Entities ?C A Quick Guide
 
One Drawback of Cambodia's Justice System
 
Patents in India: Law & Procedure
 
Everything You Ever Wanted To Know About Lawsuits
 
Patent - Business Method Patents - Part II
 
Cyber Crimes And Solutions
 
Choosing A Process Server
 
Why Military Tacticians Should Study Insect Swarm Techniques
 
Know The Types Of Adoption
 
Ford Defective Door Attorney Says:
 
 
 
 
 

Lawyers' Professional Liability Insurance for the Distressed Risk

Professional liability insurance is a necessity for lawyers. Unfortunately, not all lawyers are able ... - Cindy Wiedman
 

Patent - Business Method Patents - Part II

Second in a series of articles on business method patents. - Michael Russell
 

Employment Law: Sex Discrimination - Justification - Margin of Discretion

In the case of Hardys and Hansons plc v Lax [2005] EWCA Civ 846 (Court of Appeal), the appellant emp ... - Dr Rosanna Cooper
 
 

Attorney Fees in Franchise Litigation

Indeed no one wants to pay attorney fees do they? But someone has to pay them when there is a disput ... - Lance Winslow
 

Mining Patent Data for Competitive Intelligence

Patent are the source of the technological innovation and detailed mining of patent literature is pr ... - Vinod Singh
 
 
Home -> Privacy -> Terms & Conditions  
© 2006-2008 www.floydslist.com All Rights Reserved Worldwide.