floydslist.com
Home About Us Privacy Terms & Conditions Add Your Link Add Your Article
Search:   
Get Free Links
 
   

Automotive

   

Food & Recipe

   

Recreation

   

Self Enhancement

   

Travel & Accommodation

   

Health & Therapy

   

Children

   

Banking & Finance

   

News & Events

   

Games & Play

   

Business & Commerce

   

Policies & Law

   

Academics & Learning

   

Society & Communities

   

Art & Culture

   

Research & Science

   

Home Family & Garden

   

Medicine & Treatment

   

Jobs & Employment

   

Sports & Adventure

   

Online Shopping

   

Relationship & Lifestyle

   

Property & Estate

   

Internet & Computers

 

  Home –› News & Events –› Politics
   
 

Social Security Cruel Hoax - 1973 Editorial

   

September 19, 1973

The Social Security System is a cruel hoax on American tax payers.

It is not likely that young people entering the work force today will ever collect benefits.

Social Security is a gigantic chain-letter scheme that depends upon an ever increasing proportion of new contributors to retiring beneficiaries.

As we approach "zero population growth" - and we hit it for a short time last year - the over 65 age group will grow faster than in-coming workers. Then, the upside down pyramid of social security will topple over.

If this sounds alarming - it should!

A succession of vote-hungry, irresponsible Congresses has jeopardized what most Americans have come to rely on as a cornerstone of a secure old age.

The truth is that Social Security payments are already shaky and can't get more generous without serious strains on our economy. It may be too late already to save the system, but Social Security is too important to let it collapse through ignorance and greed.

The Old Age, Survivors, Disability and Hospital Insurance law - as Social Security is named officially - began in 1935 during the Great Depression. The primary aim of OASDHI was to encourage the retirement of workers so the unemployed could take their place.

At first, the U.S. Social Security System was, indeed, an insurance plan. Reserve funds were accumulated and saved in accordance with insurance actuarial tables.

In short order an enormous fund of cash - invested in U.S. bonds - was on hand. As we geared to fight World War II and tie need for cash soared, Congress moved the Social Security cash into the general fund. A secured annuity was replaced with a promise to pay out of future collections.

Official Social Security figures list its working fund today at $37 billion - enough for nine months of benefit payments.

Some critics contend this hand-to-mouth figure is over stated and the actual cash back-up of Social Security payments is nearer to nine WEEKS. They hint that the delay in Social Security payments a couple of months ago was caused more by a diminished cash flow as the federal fiscal year drew to a close than to a foul up in the computers.

Whatever the reason for delay in Social Security checks, the incident reveals the enormous danger of over extending the ability and willingness of American workers to subsidize their elders. Even liberal congressmen are worried and propose that future Social Security benefits be financed from general taxes.

So, the first hoax was discontinuance of Social Security as insurance.

And the second hoax is perpetration of the myth that present beneficiaries are getting back what they paid in.

Social Security will be the first casualty in the event of one more big war or one more big depression!

Back in 1935, workers paid a maximum of $30 per year into Social Security and the employers paid an equal amount. Benefits were described as "supplemental" to private earnings, savings and pensions.

The idea of "old age assistance" has enlarged during the last couple of affluent decades to "old age support."

Now, this is a highly emotional appeal - that our old people should enjoy their senior years at a high standard of living whether or not they have contributed very much to it.

This is humanitarian, but impossible.

In every election since 1950, Congress has raised Social Security benefits - and the taxes to pay them. It is significant that these raises occurred only at election time.

Since that time, the scope and cost of Social Security has skyrocketed:

  • The number of persons covered has gone up from 46 million to 95 million.

  • The number of beneficiaries has gone up from 3 million to 29 million.

  • The amount of benefit payments has gone up from $1 billion to $56 billion.

  • The cost has gone up from 6 percent of all federal taxes to 20 percent.
One of the principal causes of today's inflation is Social Security. While government trys to keep inflation down to five to seven percent - the old goal of three percent is now a joke - Social Security has leaped forward an average of 15 percent per year in the last two decades.

The last election-year Congress was even more generous with Social Security beneficiaries, giving an immediate 20 percent hike, a 5.6 percent increase for 1974 and an automatic increase thereafter every time the Consumer Price Index goes up 3 percent.

A munificent gesture. But at the present rate, Social Security is expected to reach $250 billion in 1985. This will cost more than all the rest of government put together, including the armed forces.

Germany, Great Britain and Sweden broke under the economic strain of taxes in excess of 50 percent of national income. On the basis of their experience, therefore, we should reach the breaking point within a generation - unless we hasten the day with new social programs now proposed.

The time remaining for us to find a satisfactory compromise between "need" and "ability to pay" is short.

In 1950, 22 workers were contributing to Social Security for every person receiving benefits. Today only three workers have to bear the load for one beneficiary. The one-to-one ratio is only a few years away.

As payroll costs go up, employers try harder to substitute machinery for people. And workers grow unwilling to support non-workers.

A return to a fully-insured old age assistance program, under which workers will receive the fruits of their own labor, is a vital first step to real security.

Author: Lindsey Williams
 
Author Bio:

Lindsey Williams

Lindsey is best known as a columnist for the Sun Coast Media Group of four daily Florida newspapers and website in Charlotte County, Englewood, North Port and Arcadia. He is a member of the National Society of Newspaper Columnists.

Lin is a semi-retired newspaper publisher, having owned and operated a group of seven weekly newspapers in northeast Ohio. In addition, he wrote a syndicated column on national current events for 24 newspapers in Ohio and Kentucky.

He has been awarded Daughters of the American Revolution national medal for his ?leadership, service and patriotism;? the George Washington medal of the Freedoms Foundation at Valley Forge for a series of columns ?relating American history to current events;? and the Genesis Award by the University Club of Charlotte County for ?community service to history and politics.?

He has written five books on history, three of them about the Charlotte Harbor area. His ?Our Fascinating Past: Charlotte Harbor Later Years? in collaboration with U.S. Cleveland was chosen by the Florida Historical Society for its 1997 Golden Quill Award, the organization?s highest book honor. In addition, the society has twice awarded him its Golden Quill for his ?outstanding continuing series of local history.? His book ?Boldly Onward,? about early Spanish explorers in Florida, is a standard reference for scholars.

Lindsey has been writing to deadline for 64 years. He edited Flint Central High School and Mott College newspapers - - but began his professional career as a sports writer for the ?Flint, Michigan, Daily Journal.?

During four years with the U.S. Navy in World War II, he served as Specialist Writer-Public Relations at Detroit, and as a First Class Petty Officer and ship?s photographer aboard South Atlantic destroyer and-sonar trainer Eagle Class ships.

He resumed his journalism career as a reporter for the ?Detroit Free Press,? followed by positions as editorial director for Michigan Bell Telephone Co. at Detroit and public relations assistant for AT&T at New York City.

Lin returned to his first love, journalism, in 1959 and ?semi-retired? 23 years ago to Punta Gorda where he was persuaded to continue writing.

 
 
 

Related Articles

 
Eschatology - Rapture Ready and the Second Coming
 
Like it or Not Tropical Storm Ernesto is Coming
 
Slavery Reimbursement and Restitution For All African-Americans
 
The No Member of Congress/Senate Left Behind Test
 
So How Far Have We Come? Here are some of the 2001 Anti Terrorist Projects
 
The Blessing of the Christian Sabbath
 
Ancient Greek Deities
 
Tie in State Lotteries with Voting
 
Terrorism In Paris
 
Is Government Really Corrupt; It is Nothing More than a Management System
 
 
 
 
 

Gandhi and Comparative Religions

The comparative study of religions has never been merely an academic concern for Mahatma Gandhi, the ... - Sunny Sambhara
 

US Government Own Worst Enemy

The United States Government, our government, the one we own is its own worst enemy. And that means ... - Lance Winslow
 

Europe Swings Both Ways

Europe swings. Hardcore proof: the EU overwhelmingly passed a resolution last month against "Homopho ... - David Ben-Ariel
 
 

Ray Nagin and Chocolate?

What comes to mind when you think of chocolate? Perhaps Godiva, or even Hershey?s? Both of which get ... - Veronica Kettler
 

Build Our Own Ships and Run Our Own Ports Say Dubai Deal Critics

At least one political blogger is saying that we should build our own ships and run our own ports, a ... - Lance Winslow
 
 
Home -> Privacy -> Terms & Conditions  
© 2006-2008 www.floydslist.com All Rights Reserved Worldwide.